Wolfe v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distilling from various tests principle that hearing officer must be given some means to evaluate truth or falsity of information obtained from confidential informants, such as informant’s identity or reliability
• disciplinary committee’s September 1980 action not arbitrary when committee was given summaries by prison officials of the testimony of two confidential informants, and told that one informant had given accurate information in past

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).