Wolfe Bros. Shoe v. Bishop

Citations

• 72 Kan. 687
• 84 P. 133
• 1905 Kan. LEXIS 403

Syllabus

<p>1. Contracts — Sale of Shoes — Dispute as to Quality — Acceptance. Plaintiff’s attempt to sell some of the shoes that were salable while waiting for defendant’s agent to adjust plaintiff’s claim that the consignment was defective held not to amount to an acceptance of the entire lot.</p> <p>2. - Sample — Evidence. Evidence being admitted without objection that the shoes were not equal to the sample, it was held proper for plaintiff to produce one of the shoes and point out the defects.</p>