D. Kansas· 3/30/1994
Wolf v. United States
Citations
- 157 F.R.D. 494
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4064
- 1994 WL 542050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a stay is particularly appropriate “where the case is likely to be finally concluded as a result of the ruling” on a dispositive motion, and “where the facts sought through uncompleted discovery would not affect the resolution of the motion.”
- recognizing a stay is particularly appropriate “where the case is likely to be finally concluded as a result of the ruling” on a dispositive motion, and “where the facts sought through uncompleted discovery would not affect the resolution of the motion.”
- “The general policy in this district is not to stay discovery even though dispositive motions are pending.”
- “[I]t is appropriate for a court to stay discovery until a pending dispositive motion is decided, especially where . . . the facts sought through uncompleted discovery would not affect the resolution of the motion[.]”
- “[I]t is appropriate for a court to stay discovery until a pending dispositive motion is decided, especially where . . . the facts sought through uncompleted discovery would not affect the resolution of the motion[.]”
- “[I]t is appropriate for a court to stay discovery until a pending dispositive motion is decided, especially where . . . the facts sought through uncompleted discovery would not affect the resolution of the motion[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Wolf v. United States
37 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Wolf v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1926-03-13· cited 81×
- Wolf v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1935-03-11· cited 19×
- Wolf v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1922-04-10· cited 16×
- Wolf v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1923-05-28· cited 16×
- Wolf v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1929-11-12· cited 15×
- Wolf v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1919-05-13· cited 8×
- Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-11-13· cited 7×
- Wolf v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1916-11-16· cited 7×
- Wolf v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-03-04· cited 6×
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-04-02· cited 3×
- Wolf v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-11-02· cited 2×
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 2×
- Wolf v. United StatesD. Kansas· 1994-05-20· cited 1×
- Wolf v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2006-09-08· cited 1×
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 1×
- Wolf v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1938-10-17
- Wolf v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1940-01-29
- Wolf v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1927-04-07
- Wolf v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1932-04-11
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-12-06
- Wolf v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-10-03
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1922-11-27
- Wolf v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-03-04
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-10-03
- Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1950-03-06
- Wolf v. United StatesD. Nebraska· 1957-04-30
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-11-01
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-03-21
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-03-21
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-31
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-31
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-12-06
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-10-03
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2017-10-02
- Wolf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2019-03-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.