Wolf v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the the rehabilitation of prisoners legitimately first prong does not subsume the rest of the targeted by the Ensign Amendment could inquiry
• noting that “courts of appeals ordinarily remand to the trial court where the Turner factors cannot be assessed because of an undeveloped record”
• observing that the first prong does not subsume the rest of the inquiry
• discussing Turner in the context of a prison policy providing that no movies rated R, X, or NC-17 may be shown to inmates
• rejecting “conclusory” statements that make it difficult to determine what connection a court sees between the advanced penological interest and a prison restriction
• requiring an evidentiary showing roughly corresponding to the degree to which the required means-end connection is “attenuated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).