Wolf Creek Ski Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court order voiding approval of LMJV’s resort development plans
• in interpreting statute, court looks at “the context in which a statutory term appears” (quoting Robinson v. Colo. State Lottery Div., 155 P.3d 409, 413 (Colo. App. 2006))
• “[P]laintiffs do not dispute the developer’s assertion that they failed to raise those arguments before the board. Thus, we will not consider them.”
• “[P]laintiffs do not dispute the developer’s assertion that they failed to raise those arguments before the board. Thus, we will not consider them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).