Washington Supreme Court· 12/21/2006
Woldson v. Woodhead
Citations
- 149 P.3d 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, as matter of first impression in Washington, that there was no basis for denying proven damages for injuries sustained after filing but before trial, where continuing trespass was not abated as of time of trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chambers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kowalski, B. v. TOA PA V, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-03-27· cited 43×
- Hawley v. MowattColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 10×
- Crystal Lotus Enterprises, Ltd. v. City of ShorelineCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-04-19· cited 8×
- Township Of Fraser V Harvey HaneyMichigan Supreme Court· 2022-02-08
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1985-11-14· cited 152×
- Fradkin v. Northshore Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-06-14· cited 36×
- Doran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1901-03-07· cited 24×
- Island Lime Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1922-12-28· cited 18×
- Woldson v. WoodheadCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-23· cited 2×
Other cases named Woldson v. Woodhead
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.