Skip to main content
First Circuit· 10/26/1999

Wolde Wallace v. Reno

Citations

  • 194 F.3d 279
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26885
  • 1999 WL 959538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts retain habeas jurisdiction under the transitional rules and noting that the Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits have so held
  • holding that case was commenced for retroactivity purposes when the INS issued an order to show cause even though the INS did not file that order to show cause with the immigration court until after AEDPA's enactment
  • finding that the deportation process effectively begins when an Order to Show Cause is served on the alien
  • finding that in the context of waiver to deportation proceedings, “when an order to show cause is served on the alien, the deportation process has effectively begun”
  • holding to like effect under the transitional rules
  • considering a case where the OSC was served but not filed prior to AEPDA's enactment and finding that §§ 440(d) did not affect the statutory entitlement to consideration for §§ 212(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Coffin, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wolde Wallace v. Reno

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.