Wojtowicz v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that laches is disfavored in environmental eases: “most fundamental ... is the observation of Chief Judge Friendly that the ‘tardiness of the parties in raising the issue cannot excuse compliance with NEPA; primary responsibility under the Act rests with the agency.’ ”
• may be fruitless to apply NEPA where project is so far along as to preclude change of plans
• HUD's retention of significant discretionary powers under pre-1970 contract could result in requiring EIS
• HUD’s retention of significant discretionary powers under pre-1970 contract could result in requiring EIS
• NEPA only requires a meaningful review of Federal action
• NEPA only requires a meaningful review of Federal action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).