Wojtowicz v. Delacorte Press

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• depiction of plaintiffs under fictitious names in film “Dog Day Afternoon” fails to state a claim under § 51

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1978-11-09· cited 211×
• Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg Productions
  California Supreme Court· 1979-12-05· cited 93×
• Doe v. Roe
  New York Supreme Court· 1977-11-21· cited 51×
• Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 44×
• In re Dora P.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-06-28· cited 32×
• Cerasani v. Sony Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1998-01-15· cited 22×
• Allen v. Gordon
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-01-12· cited 20×
• Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-03-08· cited 16×
• Costanza v. Seinfeld
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-01-04· cited 12×
• Crandall v. Personal Mortgage Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-12-23· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flores v. Mosler Safe Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1959-12-30· cited 62×
• Meeropol v. Nizer
  S.D. New York· 1974-07-31· cited 58×
• University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1965-02-09· cited 54×
• University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1965-03-18· cited 51×
• Waters v. Moore
  New York Supreme Court· 1972-06-05· cited 6×