California Court of Appeal· 7/23/2012
Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.
Citations
- 207 Cal. App. 4th 1252
- 144 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545
- 2012 WL 2989811
- 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 831
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding 5 “consumers who successfully achieve the goals of their litigation through a compromise 6 agreement” may recover attorneys’ fees and costs as prevailing parties under the Song-Beverly 7 Act
- “[W]e hold that the pretrial dismissal with prejudice pursuant to the compromise agreement was sufficient for 28 purposes of section 1794(d) to allow an award of attorney fees and costs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-03-10· cited 76×
- Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-18· cited 44×
- Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-02-19· cited 36×
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. CityCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-03-28· cited 31×
- Roe v. HalbigCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-11-20· cited 23×
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-09-11· cited 11×
- Hyundai Motor America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-03-20· cited 10×
- Linton v. Cnty. of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-01-23· cited 9×
- York v. StrongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-03-10· cited 5×
- MacQuiddy v. Mercedes-BenzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-01-29
- Linton v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-01-23
- Patel v. Mercedes-Benz USACalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-12-31
- Garcia v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-04-05
- Duff v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-01-27
- Soni v. Cartograph, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2023-04-05
- Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-04-11
- Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-05-09
- Rheinhart v. Nissan North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2023-06-27
- Tidrick v. FCA US LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2025-07-22
- Hatlevig v. General Motors LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2026-02-17
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-02-26· cited 627×
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 279×
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-10-28· cited 184×
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 183×
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1998-04-27· cited 181×
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1994-03-11· cited 88×
- Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-03-26· cited 74×
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-03-08· cited 67×
- Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-08-18· cited 57×
- Chinn v. KMR Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-08-22· cited 55×
- Otay River Constructors v. San Diego ExpresswayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-01-07· cited 48×
- Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-03-11· cited 45×
- Berg v. DardenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-07-16· cited 44×
- Reveles v. Toyota by the BayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-09-22· cited 44×
- Kim v. EUROMOTORS WEST/THE AUTO GALLERYCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-04-02· cited 41×
- Rothschild v. Tyco Internationall (US), Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2000-08-30· cited 39×
- Turner v. Ass'n of American Medical CollegesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-03-24· cited 39×
- Gavaldon v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court· 2004-06-23· cited 37×
- On-Line Power, Inc. v. MazurCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-04-17· cited 35×
- Berti v. SANTA BARBARA BEACH PROPERTIESCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-11-27· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.