Wogan v. Kunze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating when reviewing a circuit court's grant of summary judgment, appellate courts apply the same standard that governs the circuit court
• noting even if the “evidentiary facts are not disputed but the conclusions or inferences to be drawn from them are, summary judgment should be denied” (citation omitted)
• patient’s wife could not maintain a claim under SCUTPA against physicians in an action brought in her representative capacity as the personal representative of her husband’s estate
• \[T]his state has not found that medical negligence or malpractice will support a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty. Nor have our courts found the failure of a doctor to offer assistance in filing a Medicare claim or other claim is a breach of fiduciary duty.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).