Wofton J. Stewart v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Feres doctrine rationale supported barring suit involving collision because military personnel could be required to testify
• finding that the Supreme Court has broadened the Feres Doctrine to include “at a minimum, all injuries suffered by military personnel that are even remotely related to the individual’s status as a member of the military”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).