Skip to main content
· 7/5/1994

Wofford v. Ethyl Corp.

Citations

  • 447 S.E.2d 187
  • 316 S.C. 75
  • 1994 S.C. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he plain language of [S.C. Rule Civ. Pro.] 34(c) recognizes that an independent discovery action may be maintained against a non-party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.