Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to consider an issue not raised by either party before the Board
• holding that courts of appeals “lack[] jurisdiction to review objections that were not urged before the Board”
• concluding that Congress intended to allow whatever top-down pressures for unionization might arise from subcontracting agreements reached in the context of the collecting bargaining relationship
• holding that “the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review objections that were not urged before the Board”
• concluding that Congress intended to allow whatever top-down pressures for unionization might arise from subcontracting agreements reached in the context of the collecting bargaining relationship
• holding that even where the Board raises an issue sua sponte, the aggrieved party must seek reconsideration to the Board before seeking judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).