Skip to main content
· 2/19/2008

Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette Cty. Bd. of Revision

Citations

  • 117 Ohio St. 3d 1402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • highlighting that parties to a contract whose enforceability is challenged have an interest in the outcome of litigation
  • “The general rule is that all parties to the instrument sought to be cancelled are indispensable parties to the suit for cancellation, unless it is obvious that the one not joined has no interest whatever in the subject matter of the suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.