Skip to main content
· 4/7/1992

W.O. And Eliza Narramore v. The United States

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 1048
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6272
  • 1992 WL 67162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Fifth Amendment is a “tacit recognition of a preexisting power to take private property for public use”
  • “When the Federal Government initiates eminent domain proceedings, federal courts lack authority to expand or contract the property or estate described in the condemnation filing.”
  • “When a property owner seeks compensation for a taking beyond the scope of the Government’s condemnation action, the proper remedy is the Tucker Act; thus, when damages exceed $10,000, the proper forum is the Claims Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plager, Clevenger, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.