Wldrnes Scty v. Norton, Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 706 relief is available, notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a), where the agency ignored a statutory dead- line
• finding that declarations submitted by the plaintiff, although stating an aesthetic and recreational interest, were insufficient to establish standing where they did not demonstrate particularized and concrete injuries
• holding “a plethora of racially offensive jokes, racist graffiti and derogatory comments,” along with “isolation and segregation” were among the “indignities that Jordan faced while working at the Division.”
• stating, in dictum, that this type of claim would not be barred by the statute of limitations
• 1isting an agency’s characterization of its own action as the first of three factors to consider in determining Whether an agency has issued a binding norm or a mere policy statement
• discussing, in dicta, that dismissal of plaintiff’s claim as time-barred under § 2401(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).