WL May Co., Inc. v. Philco-Ford Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a repurchase provision in a contract between merchants was not unconscionable where, “in effect any exercise of the repurchase election by [one merchant] would have been restricted by its obligation of good faith” (emphasis added)
• \party asserting unconscionability must demonstrate that the clause in question was unconscionable at the time the contract was made\
• “party asserting unconscionability must demonstrate that the clause in question was unconscionable at the time the contract was made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).