W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Garlock, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether an imprecise claim limitation, such as the phrase ‘about 100% per second’ is literally met, is a question of fact for the trial court.”
• “The fact that the defendant has stopped infringing is generally not a reason for denying an injunction against future infringement unless the evidence is very persuasive that further infringement will not take place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).