W.J. Schafer Associates, Inc. v. Cordant, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing same and explicitly “declin[ing] to create such a cause of action”
• “Clearly, therefore, the Teaming Agreement shows by its express terms that it was not an enforceable contract[.]”
• “Today, however, we hold that promissory estoppel is not a cognizable cause of action in the Commonwealth, and we decline to create such a cause of action.”
• “[P]arties can include binding provisions in a MOU so long as there is ‘mutual assent of the contracting parties to terms reasonably certain under the circumstances to have an enforceable contract.’”
• teaming agreement standing alone did not create any binding obligations
• teaming agreement standing alone did not create any binding obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).