Witzke v. Hiller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration because he did not demonstrate “any palpable defect” in the court’s order and therefore “fail[ed] to meet his burden” under Local Rule 7.1
• articulating the standard for a motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 7.1(h)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).