Wittschen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although asportation was an essential element of the underlying crime, it was unnecessary to prove asportation where the defendant was merely charged with criminal attempt and was not charged with commission of the actual underlying crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wittschen v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1989-09-29· cited 28×
• Mobley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-18· cited 9×
• State v. Vines
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-11· cited 7×
• Franklin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Howell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-01-30· cited 36×
• Helton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-03· cited 34×
• McGinnis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-05-21· cited 19×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-03-12· cited 17×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-03-18· cited 9×