Witters v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• shareholder action; “[o]rders entered after the filing of a notice of appeal are valid if the substantive issues in the interlocutory appeal are not altered so that they present a new case to the reviewing court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hartz v. Brehm Preparatory School, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-02-18· cited 14×
• Jones v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-30· cited 9×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Greer v. Illinois Housing Development Authority
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-05-18· cited 454×
• R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-02-20· cited 183×
• Gidwitz v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1960-09-29· cited 54×
• Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Ass'n v. Hunt
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1889-01-25· cited 39×
• Payne v. Coates-Miller, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-01-18· cited 23×
• Firebaugh v. McGovern
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1949-09-22· cited 21×
• Cygnar v. Martin-Trigona
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-03-20· cited 19×
• Witters v. Hicks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-21· cited 19×
• Lind v. Spannuth
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1956-02-24· cited 16×
• Taxy v. Worden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-22· cited 14×