Wittemen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellants also allege willful violations of the FCRA, which require the additional showing that the defendant acted knowingly or with reckless disregard of the statute’s terms.” (emphasis added) (citing Seamans v. Temple Univ., 744 F.3d 853, 868 (3d Cir. 2014))
• applying Section 1681e(b)’s “inaccurate” standard to Section 1681i claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).