Wittekind v. Rusk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing sanctions for frivolous appeal on a pro se party for bringing an appeal that was not “well grounded in fact or warranted by existing law”
• imposing Rule 375(b) sanctions against pro se plaintiff, where the plaintiff filed a meritless petition to reopen judgment on small-claims case nine months after the case was complete and where he had been advised by the trial court during a sanctions hearing to terminate the litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).