Witte v. General Nutrition Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that aggregation concerns were present because “[defendants do not dispute that plaintiff and the members of the public he represents have separate and distinct claims for relief against defendants”
• “Defendants’ argument—that this- Court should consider their total compliance costs in calculating the amount in controversy— would circumvent the non-aggregation principle articulated in Snyder and Zahn.”
• “Defendants’ argument—that this Court should consider their total compliance costs in calculating the amount in controversy—would circumvent the non-aggregation principle articulated in Snyder and Zahn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).