Witt v. State, Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because employee had not introduced admissible evidence showing that he was hired or fired for an improper reason
• “Issues not briefed are deemed waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).