Skip to main content
· 10/17/1913

Witt v. Lexington & Eastern Railroad

Citations

  • 155 Ky. 382
  • 159 S.W. 798
  • 1913 Ky. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and describing his potential testimony
  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and describing his potential testimony
  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and describing his potential testimony
  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and or describing his potential testimony
  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and or describing his potential testimony
  • noting that movant did not provide an affidavit from the witness stating that he would have been available to testify and or describing his potential testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.