Witt v. Jones & Jones Law Offices, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment does not toll a statute of limitations past the date on which a party obtains actual - 24 - 2021 IL App (2d) 191034-U knowledge of concealed facts
• failing to find a case adopting the rule in Illinois and noting the Illinois Supreme Court’s rejection of the continuing course of treatment doctrine “suggests the court is not ready to adopt a continuous representation rule” for legal malpractice claims
• noting merely that the rule “has not been adopted in Colorado”
• constitutional arguments waived for failure to raise them in trial court and failure to comply with Rule 19; “[f]urther,” the constitutional arguments were “without merit”
• \[i]n Cunningham the doctrine was explained as a tolling of the statute of repose until the end of a doctor- patient relationship\
• same, where plaintiffs knew about their cause of action three to five months before limitations period ended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).