Witt v. Harlan
Citations
- 66 Tex. 660
- 2 S.W. 41
- 1886 Tex. LEXIS 592
Syllabus
<p>' 1. Evidence—Record of deed.—For a record copy of a deed to be admissible in evidence, it is not necessary that it contain anything to represent the seal required to accompany the certificate of acknowledgment of the deed. (Following Ballard v. Perry, 28 Tex., 347.)</p> <p>2. Construction—Deed.—The granting clause of a deed recited “ do hereby bargain, sell, alien and convey unto, etc., the entire and undivided one-half of all my lands in Texas.” It then proceeded: “Some of which are described as follows, to wit:” and described several tracts in Texas owned by the grantor; after which it continued, “ as well as all my lands or right to land of any kind and description whether legal or equitable in the state of Texas, or in any of the counties of said state.” Held, the deed was a conveyance of an undivided one-half interest in all the grantor’s lands in this state.</p>
Judges: Willie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dahlberg v. HoldenTexas Supreme Court· 1951-02-21· cited 121×
- Kokernot v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1950-06-02· cited 76×
- Benskin v. BarksdaleTexas Commission of Appeals· 1923-01-10· cited 75×
- J. Hiram Moore, Ltd. v. GreerTexas Supreme Court· 2005-05-20· cited 40×
- Summer v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 38×
- Gibson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-05-13· cited 19×
- James H. Davis, Individually and D/B/A Jd Minerals, and Jdmi, Llc v. Mark MuellerTexas Supreme Court· 2017-05-26· cited 18×
- Broadway v. StoneTexas Commission of Appeals· 1929-03-27· cited 18×
- Coppard v. GlasscockTexas Commission of Appeals· 1932-02-24· cited 14×
- ABS Sherman Properties, Ltd. v. SarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-13· cited 9×
- Hubermann v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court· 1896-01-21· cited 9×
- Higgins v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-07-21· cited 8×
- Carpenter v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals· 1925-05-13· cited 6×
- Barker v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1929-01-02· cited 6×
- Golden v. Pilchuck Tribe No. 42, Improved Order of Red MenWashington Supreme Court· 1913-01-21· cited 3×
- Fantham v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1951-03-29· cited 2×
- Dahlberg v. HoldenTexas Supreme Court· 1951-04-04
- J. Hiram Moore, Ltd. v. Mary GreerTexas Supreme Court· 2004-12-31
- Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLCTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-08-17
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.