Skip to main content
· 3/1/1916

Witman v. Levan

Citations

  • 62 Pa. Super. 262
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 402

Syllabus

<p>Partnership — Assumpsit for worJe done — Evidence of partnership.</p> <p>In an action for work done, against two persons alleged to be partners, where it appears that the work was ordered by one of the defendants who was not served, the evidence is sufficient to establish a partnership between the two defendants and to support a judgment on a verdict against the one served, where the evidence tends to show that the latter was the owner of a device, that he sold a one-third interest to the other defendant, that the device was to be erected and operated for the joint interest of the owners, and presumptively that the distribution of the profits was to be in proportion to the interest of the owners in the business.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Rich, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.