Witke v. State Conservation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the state’s restriction of access to navigable streams or lakes “is a deprivation of the citizen of his property without due process of law”
• stating that use of flowing surface water “is subject to the same rights, duties, limitations, and regulations as presently apply to meandered streams”
• holding the state’s restriction of access to navigable streams or lakes “is a deprivation of the citizen of his property without due process of law”
• rejecting a fee for access to Clear Lake that was not based on an improvement or service provided
• state may impose charges for use of improved waterway
• state may impose charges for use of improved waterway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).