Supreme Court of Arkansas· 11/6/1995
Witherspoon v. State
Citations
- 909 S.W.2d 314
- 322 Ark. 376
- 1995 Ark. LEXIS 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have recognized that the sanctity of jury deliberations is a fundamental precept of our adversary system.”
- \We have recognized that the sanctity of jury deliberations is a fundamental precept of our adversary system.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roaf, Glaze, Corbin, State, Ark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. KrihoColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-29· cited 207×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-13· cited 36×
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-07-07· cited 29×
- Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-06-17· cited 26×
- James v. Pulaski County Circuit Court, Fifth DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2014-06-26· cited 20×
- Stilley v. UNIV. OF ARK. AT FT. SMITHSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-09-18· cited 15×
- Burradell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-10-07· cited 13×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2016-11-10· cited 13×
- Blake v. ShellstromSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2012-11-15· cited 5×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-09-16· cited 2×
- Carrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-03-09· cited 1×
- Tanner v. GregersenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-11-04
- Mercedes Loren Taylor v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-03-03
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.