Withers v. Fiscus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the United States it seems to be settled, notwithstanding a few adjudications to the con- trary . . . , that such affidavits cannot be received”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado
  Supreme Court· 2017-03-06· cited 326×
• Long v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1884-05-27· cited 45×
• Posey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1956-01-06· cited 12×
• Jones v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1883-05-15· cited 9×
• Taylor v. Garnett
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1887-04-05· cited 9×
• McKinley v. First National Bank
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1889-04-23· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Meade v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1844-06-15· cited 28×