Skip to main content
· 1/27/1984

Witherel v. Balling Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 99 A.D.2d 646
  • 472 N.Y.S.2d 218
  • 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no fiduciary duty governing broker/client relationship where broker allegedly overcharged fees in connection with nondisere-tionary brokerage account (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • dismissing fiduciary-duty claim because allegations in the complaint did not “purport to assert a relationship different from that of an ordinary broker-client relationship”
  • dismissing complaint because plaintiff “made no effort to rebut [defendant’s] showing . . . that plaintiff failed to object in writing within ten days of the imposition of the [fee]” as was required under the parties’ contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.