Witherby v. Thomas
Citations
- 55 Cal. 9
Syllabus
<p>Hew Trial—Conflict of Evidence.—The evidence in the case held to be conflicting.</p> <p>Instructions—Conflicting Instructions—Refusal of Instructions.— Certain instructions, discussed by the Court, held not to be conflicting, and others held to have been properly refused.</p> <p>Evidence—Increase of Cattle.—Certain testimony held to be admissible.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that whether defendant’s statement was induced by hope of benefit was a “close question” and concluding that trial court’s resolution of the issue was not clearly erroneous
- construing OCGA § 17-10-30 (b) (2)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.