District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/23/2010
Witham v. Sheehan Pipeline Construction Co.
Citations
- 45 So. 3d 105
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 14220
- 2010 WL 3703359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the test for harmless error in a civil case is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached
- noting that the test for harmless error in a civil ease is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached
- “An error in the introduction of evidence may be considered harmless if the evidence is merely cumulative to other evidence that was properly introduced.”
- “An error in the introduction of evidence may be considered harmless if the evidence is merely cumulative to other evidence that was properly introduced.”
- “An error in the 3 introduction of evidence may be considered harmless if the evidence is merely cumulative to other evidence that was properly introduced.”
- “Because Dr. Harbison is not a medical doctor, he was not qualified to testify as to the medical cause of Claimant’s condition in this particular case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Wolf, Rowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Special v. BauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-16· cited 28×
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. MackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-13· cited 4×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-24· cited 3×
- Robinson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-21· cited 2×
- Miami Dade County School Board v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-03· cited 2×
- Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Shuler Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-12· cited 2×
- Hernandez v. PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITALDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-31· cited 1×
- JACK STEIN v. JOHN CHARLES and RIVERWALK OF THE PALM BEACHES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20
- Styles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-19
- Stokes v. Schindler Elevator Corp./BroadspireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-09
- Stein v. CharlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20
- Blackshear, Jr., M. D., P. A., Blackshear, M. D. v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-09-26
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Michael Jordan Lipp, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-29
- Blackshear, Jr., M. D., P. A., Blackshear, M. D. v. HaynesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-12-31
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- White Const. Co., Inc. v. DupontSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-07-26· cited 115×
- Linn v. FossumSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-11-02· cited 45×
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. BlackmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-07· cited 19×
- Sanlando Utility Corp. v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-18· cited 18×
- Turner v. G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-18· cited 17×
- Thomas v. Salvation ArmyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-14· cited 14×
- ORIENTE EXP. INN v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-17· cited 6×
- Johns Eastern Co., Inc. v. MattaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-07· cited 5×
- Foster's Auto Crushing v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-17· cited 4×
- Crawford & Co. v. BaxlaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-21· cited 3×
- US AGRI-CHEMICALS CORP. v. CamachoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.