Witcher Construction Co. v. Estes II Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• supporting the conclusion that two projects were part of one continuous improvement because “the mortgage financing provided by appellant covered both phases of the renovation, indicating appellant knew that the renovation was a single improvement”
• construction work is one single improvement if it serves same general purpose
• improvements are separate if no relationship exists between contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).