Witchel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Expert testimony is required when the question involved goes beyond the field of ordinary knowledge and experiences of judges or jurors.”
• \ 'ordinary care has reference to probabilities of danger rather than possibilities of peril' \
• in medical malpractice context, expert testimony was required because it was beyond field of ordinary knowledge and experience of jurors to understand standard of care
• “[ejxpert testimony is required ‘when the question involved goes beyond the field of the ordinary knowledge and experience’ ” of average juror
• “Expert testimony is required when the question involved goes beyond the field of the ordinary knowledge and experience of judges or jurors.”
• ‘‘[e]xpert testimony is required when the question involved goes beyond the field of the ordinary knowledge and experience of judges or jurors’’ (emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).