Wisnewski v. Oster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “where there [a]re distracting circumstances or sudden emergencies we have held that the question of contributory negligence was for the jury”
• “where there [a]re distracting circumstances or sudden emergencies we have held that the question of contributory negligence was for the jury”
• plaintiff was contributorily negligent because sufficient “distracting circumstances” did not exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).