Wisner v. Carter

Citations

• 117 Wash. 623
• 201 P. 918
• 1921 Wash. LEXIS 901

Syllabus

<p>Vendos and Purchaser (60) — Rescission by Purchaser — Fraud —Evidence—Sufficiency. Rescission of an exchange of properties! is properly decreed where the evidence shows that by collusion between one of the parties and the broker representing both parties the value of one of the properties which was situated in another county was grossly misrepresented by its owner and the broker.</p> <p>Same (74) — Fraud—Action for Rescission — Judgment—Extent of Relief. In rescinding an exchange of properties on the ground of misrepresentation by one of the grantors and a broker acting jointly for both grantors, the refusal of the court to allow credit to the defendants for sums retained by the broker as commission and expense money was proper.</p>