Wiskup v. Liberty Buick Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing as “strong” plaintiffs argument that automobile lease security deposits fall squarely within the definition of a security interest
• characterizing as \strong\ plaintiff's argument that automobile lease security deposits fall squarely within the definition of a security interest
• finding “thin” plaintiffs argument that the Deposit Act merely concerns itself with the return of security deposits, only mentioning interest as an incidental matter, and that the lessor’s basic duty concerning interest on deposits is still governed by the UCC
• finding \thin\ plaintiff's argument that the Deposit Act merely concerns itself with the return of security deposits, only mentioning interest as an incidental matter, and that the lessor's basic duty concerning interest on deposits is still governed by the UCC
• Rule of 78s is formula for determining amount of interest earned at given point in time during loan’s term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).