Wisey's 1 LLC v. Nimellis Pizzeria LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding state claims “substantially predominate” where they “require[d] different elements of proof than the federal claims” and involved “several” other witnesses
• “Here, there is no legal overlap and only some background factual overlap. Thus, there is no common nucleus of operative fact to support supplemental jurisdiction.”
• no supplemental jurisdiction where state claims “do not have a legal overlap with the [federal] claims” and the only factual overlap is that the claims “relate[d] generally to the parties’ broader background dispute”
• “Although they originate from the same general background facts, [defendant] has not proven that the two sets of claims are derived from a common nucleus of operative fact so as to satisfy section 1367(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).