Skip to main content
· 5/20/2009

Wiser v. Elliott

Citations

  • 209 P.3d 337
  • 228 Or. App. 489
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the removal of tracks and letter abandoning the “operating purposes” of the railroad line is insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.