Wiseman v. Spaulding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s refusal to recuse itself where appellant’s affidavit contained “nothing more than circumstances from which it might be inferred that the Trial Judge might have some reason to have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the parties”
• affirming trial court's refusal to recuse itself where appellant's affidavit contained “nothing more than circumstances from which it might be inferred that the Trial Judge might have some reason to have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the parties”
• affirming the trial court’s refusal to recuse itself where appellant’s affidavit contained “nothing more than circumstances from which it might be inferred that the Trial Judge might have some reason to have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).