Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while petitioner seeking review of FERC orders imposing conditions on its license “may be able to advance a colorable Takings-Clause claim, it is not within our jurisdiction to adjudicate it”
• “[A]n agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it abruptly departs from a position it previously held without satisfactorily explaining its reason for doing so.”
• “[A]n agency acts arbitrarily and capriciously when it abruptly departs from a position it previously held without satisfactorily explaining its reason for doing so.”
• “Given the presence of disputing expert witnesses,” the court “‘must defer to ‘the informed discretion of the responsible federal agencies.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).