Wisconsin v. Lane
Citations
- 245 U.S. 427
- 38 S. Ct. 135
- 62 L. Ed. 377
- 1918 U.S. LEXIS 2144
Syllabus
<p>The grant of sections numbered 16, for school purposes, made by § 7 of the Enabling Act of August 6,1846, c. 89, 9 Stat. 56, to the State of Wisconsin, was not an unconditional grant in prcesenti; it was subject to the right of Congress to make other disposition of the land before the sections became identified by surveys finally approved, leaving the State the right to obtain other sections by way of indemnity.</p> <p>By the treaty of October 18,1848, 9 Stat. 952, the Menominee Indians ceded to the United States their land-holdings in Wisconsin in exchange for other lands farther west, and a sum of money; but, dis- . satisfied with the new lands and desiring to stay in Wisconsin, they remained upon the .ceded lands during the period of two years allowed by the treaty, and extensions' granted thereunder by the President, until, by action of the Indian Department and pursuant to an act of Congress appropriating money for the purpose, they were removed in 1852 to another tract in Wisconsin, selected for their reservation. This removal was at first referred to in the act as temporary, but the Wisconsin legislature, in 1853, assented to their remaining on the tract, and by the treaty of May 12, 1854, 10 Stat. 1064, for the purpose of acquiring the new lands as a permanent home, the Indians relinquished the lands assigned them by the treaty of 1848, and the United States set apart for their home, to be held as Indian lands are held, a reservation including part of the reservation of 1852, with some additional townships. Held, that sections numbered -16, which were embraced by both reservations but were not identified by finally approved surveys until after the reservation of 1852 was made, Were by that reservation and the reservation of 1854 “disposed of” within the meaning of the school section grant in the Wisconsin enabling act, and that other sections numbered 16, embraced by the later reservation only, but lacking such identification at its creation, were likewis
Judges: Day, McReynolds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.