Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 2/4/2008

Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.

Citations

  • 516 F.3d 530
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420
  • 2008 WL 281798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a case that did not involve identical parties, that “there can be no removal on the basis of an order or other document in another case” but leaving open the possibility that a case with a “distinguishing feature” might except it from the general rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.