Seventh Circuit· 2/4/2008
Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.
Citations
- 516 F.3d 530
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420
- 2008 WL 281798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in a case that did not involve identical parties, that “there can be no removal on the basis of an order or other document in another case” but leaving open the possibility that a case with a “distinguishing feature” might except it from the general rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael Georgakis v. Illinois State UniversitySeventh Circuit· 2013-07-16· cited 113×
- In Re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationTenth Circuit· 2009-05-14· cited 33×
- Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LPSixth Circuit· 2024-06-17· cited 18×
- United States v. Deming Hospital Corp.D. New Mexico· 2013-11-21· cited 10×
- Grynberg ex rel. United States v. Exxon Co.Tenth Circuit· 2009-05-14· cited 3×
- State of New Hampshire v. P 3M Company, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2022-04-29· cited 1×
- CenturyTel of Fairwater-Brandon-Alto, LLC v. Charter Fiberlink, LLCW.D. Wisconsin· 2008-11-22
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. DamronSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-09
- Ferguson v. Lockheed MartinFifth Circuit· 2026-03-09
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 2,624×
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 947×
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 708×
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court· 1995-12-05· cited 682×
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Seventh Circuit· 1992-03-18· cited 321×
- United States ex rel. LaCorte v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.Third Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 161×
- Michael S. Dahl David Scott Huber v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2007-02-28· cited 154×
- Lott v. Pfizer, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2007-06-25· cited 109×
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. SmithSixth Circuit· 2007-11-14· cited 95×
- Green v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Fifth Circuit· 2001-12-06· cited 46×
- Gardner v. UICINinth Circuit· 2007-11-19· cited 46×
- Doe v. American Red CrossThird Circuit· 1993-12-16· cited 46×
- United States Ex Rel. Long v. SCS Business & Technical Institute, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 33×
- Phoenix Container, L.P., and Yasar Samarah v. Ken SokoloffSeventh Circuit· 2000-12-18· cited 29×
- Johansen v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1987-08-27· cited 22×
- Lozano v. GPE CONTROLSS.D. Texas· 1994-08-08· cited 21×
- Morsani v. Major League BaseballM.D. Florida· 1999-12-13· cited 20×
- Davis v. Time InsuranceS.D. Mississippi· 1988-10-20· cited 18×
- Hawaii v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.D. Hawaii· 2006-11-30· cited 14×
- Smith v. Burroughs Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1987-08-24· cited 14×
Other cases named Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.