Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a case that did not involve identical parties, that “there can be no removal on the basis of an order or other document in another case” but leaving open the possibility that a case with a “distinguishing feature” might except it from the general rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).