Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court retained jurisdiction to comply with Rule 58(a) after party filed notice of appeal
• “[A]n appeal taken from an interlocutory decision does not prevent the district court from finishing its work and rendering a final decision.”
• “[A]n appeal taken-from an interlocutory decision does not prevent the district court from finishing its work and rendering a final decision.”’
• “[A]n appeal taken-from an interlocutory decision does not prevent the district court from finishing its work and rendering a final decision.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).