Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n v. Gannett Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that answering a claim with the defense of ordinary preemption “cannot serve as a basis for [a] federal court’s power”
• “Where the state acts as a proprietor … its action will not be subjected to the heightened review to which its actions as a lawmaker may be subject.”
• “Where the state acts as a proprietor … its action will not be subjected to the heightened review to which its actions as a lawmaker may be subject.”
• “Where the state acts as a proprietor … its action will not be subjected to the heightened review to which its actions as a lawmaker may be subject.”
• “Where the state acts as a proprietor … its action will not be subjected to the heightened review to which its actions as a lawmaker may be subject.”
• “If a well-pleaded complaint by the defendant (the natural plaintiff) would have arisen under federal law, then the court has jurisdiction when the ‘natural’ defend- ant brings a declaratory-judgment suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).